linprog(method=’simplex’)¶

scipy.optimize.
linprog
(c, method='simplex', callback=None, options={'c0': None, 'A': None, 'b': None, 'maxiter': 1000, 'disp': False, 'tol': 1e12, 'bland': False, '_T_o': None}, x0=None) Minimize a linear objective function subject to linear equality and nonnegativity constraints using the two phase simplex method. Linear programming is intended to solve problems of the following form:
Minimize:
c @ x
Subject to:
A @ x == b x >= 0
 Parameters
 c1D array
Coefficients of the linear objective function to be minimized.
 c0float
Constant term in objective function due to fixed (and eliminated) variables. (Purely for display.)
 A2D array
2D array such that
A @ x
, gives the values of the equality constraints atx
. b1D array
1D array of values representing the right hand side of each equality constraint (row) in
A
. callbackcallable, optional
If a callback function is provided, it will be called within each iteration of the algorithm. The callback function must accept a single
scipy.optimize.OptimizeResult
consisting of the following fields: x1D array
Current solution vector
 funfloat
Current value of the objective function
 successbool
True when an algorithm has completed successfully.
 slack1D array
The values of the slack variables. Each slack variable corresponds to an inequality constraint. If the slack is zero, the corresponding constraint is active.
 con1D array
The (nominally zero) residuals of the equality constraints, that is,
b  A_eq @ x
 phaseint
The phase of the algorithm being executed.
 statusint
An integer representing the status of the optimization:
0 : Algorithm proceeding nominally 1 : Iteration limit reached 2 : Problem appears to be infeasible 3 : Problem appears to be unbounded 4 : Serious numerical difficulties encountered
 nitint
The number of iterations performed.
 messagestr
A string descriptor of the exit status of the optimization.
 Returns
 x1D array
Solution vector.
 statusint
An integer representing the exit status of the optimization:
0 : Optimization terminated successfully 1 : Iteration limit reached 2 : Problem appears to be infeasible 3 : Problem appears to be unbounded 4 : Serious numerical difficulties encountered
 messagestr
A string descriptor of the exit status of the optimization.
 iterationint
The number of iterations taken to solve the problem.
See also
For documentation for the rest of the parameters, see
scipy.optimize.linprog
 Options
 maxiterint
The maximum number of iterations to perform.
 dispbool
If True, print exit status message to sys.stdout
 tolfloat
The tolerance which determines when a solution is “close enough” to zero in Phase 1 to be considered a basic feasible solution or close enough to positive to serve as an optimal solution.
 blandbool
If True, use Bland’s anticycling rule [3] to choose pivots to prevent cycling. If False, choose pivots which should lead to a converged solution more quickly. The latter method is subject to cycling (nonconvergence) in rare instances.
Notes
The expected problem formulation differs between the top level
linprog
module and the method specific solvers. The method specific solvers expect a problem in standard form:Minimize:
c @ x
Subject to:
A @ x == b x >= 0
Whereas the top level
linprog
module expects a problem of form:Minimize:
c @ x
Subject to:
A_ub @ x <= b_ub A_eq @ x == b_eq lb <= x <= ub
where
lb = 0
andub = None
unless set inbounds
.The original problem contains equality, upperbound and variable constraints whereas the method specific solver requires equality constraints and variable nonnegativity.
linprog
module converts the original problem to standard form by converting the simple bounds to upper bound constraints, introducing nonnegative slack variables for inequality constraints, and expressing unbounded variables as the difference between two nonnegative variables.References
 1
Dantzig, George B., Linear programming and extensions. Rand Corporation Research Study Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1963
 2
Hillier, S.H. and Lieberman, G.J. (1995), “Introduction to Mathematical Programming”, McGrawHill, Chapter 4.
 3
Bland, Robert G. New finite pivoting rules for the simplex method. Mathematics of Operations Research (2), 1977: pp. 103107.